Book an appointment with us, or search the directory to find the right lawyer for you directly through the app.
Find out more
Deal by Design
Welcome to this edition of Law Update, focusing on the evolving M&A landscape across the MENA region. With deal activity and value continuing to grow, the region is seeing increased investor interest alongside a changing regulatory environment.
This edition explores key legal and market developments affecting M&A transactions, including regulatory reforms, foreign investment, governance, due diligence and deal structuring across the region.
For several years, incorporation of a prescribed company (PC) in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) was subject to specific eligibility requirements. Applicants were generally required to demonstrate a GCC nexus, DIFC-registered parent entity, or another recognised structuring purpose to qualify for the regime.
With effect from July 2026, the DIFC has substantially expanded access to the PC regime. The previous eligibility gateways have been removed and replaced with a supervisory model centred on the appointment of a DIFC-licensed corporate service provider (CSP).
This represents the most significant reform to the PC framework since its introduction in 2019. It is expected to broaden the use of DIFC PCs by international corporates, family offices, investment structures, and technology groups seeking an efficient holding, financing, or special-purpose vehicle platform within the DIFC. The key changes and their practical implications are outlined below.
The DIFC has removed every eligibility requirement that previously restricted who could establish a PC. There is no longer any need for a GCC connection, an existing DIFC entity, or a specific structuring purpose. Any individual or company, anywhere in the world, can apply.
Practical implications
Consider a European family office that manages wealth across multiple jurisdictions but has no existing Middle East footprint. Previously, it could not establish a PC because it lacked a qualifying GCC or DIFC nexus. Under the new framework, that family office can incorporate a PC directly — at a fraction of the cost of a full DIFC company — to hold regional real-estate investments, participate in Gulf-based joint ventures, or consolidate its Middle Eastern portfolio under a common-law, internationally-recognised structure.
Similarly, a US-based private-equity sponsor looking to set up a holding vehicle for a UAE acquisition no longer needs to route its structure through a DIFC-registered affiliate. It can go straight to a PC, appoint a licensed CSP, and have a cost-efficient, passive holding entity in place.
In exchange for opening its doors, the DIFC now requires every non-exempt PC to appoint a CSP licensed by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). The CSP handles incorporation filings, ongoing regulatory submissions, and recordkeeping on the company’s behalf.
Practical implications
Think of the CSP requirement as outsourced compliance, similar in concept to appointing a company secretary in the UK or a registered agent in the Cayman Islands, but with a broader statutory mandate.
For a multinational group incorporating a DIFC holding company to sit above its regional subsidiaries, the CSP takes on the administrative burdens of filing the annual confirmation statement, maintaining the company’s records, and serving as the regulatory point of contact. The business focuses on its commercial objectives; the CSP handles the plumbing.
Not every PC needs a CSP. If the company is controlled by a DIFC-registered entity, a DFSA-authorised firm, a government entity (now including recognised foreign governments), or a company publicly listed on a recognised stock exchange, it is classified as an ‘exempt PC’ and can operate without appointing a CSP.
Practical implications
A DIFC-headquartered asset manager that is already regulated by the DFSA can set up subsidiary PCs to hold individual investments — one per deal — creating a clean and familiar fund structure without adding a CSP to each one. The parent’s regulatory status is enough.
This also matters for sovereign wealth structures. A government-controlled investment vehicle from a recognised jurisdiction, such as a European state-development bank, can now use DIFC PCs as holding entities in its portfolio without needing to engage a local CSP for each one. The broadened definition of ‘government entity’ was specifically designed to accommodate these structures.
The definition of entities that qualify as ‘registered persons’ and can therefore grant exempt PC status to the companies they control has been narrowed. DIFC foundations and variable capital companies have been explicitly removed from this category.
Practical implications
This is the change most likely to catch existing structures off guard. A DIFC foundation that sits at the top of a family holding structure, controlling one or more PCs beneath it, could previously rely on its DIFC registration to exempt those PCs from additional compliance requirements. That is no longer the case. Each of those PCs must now appoint a CSP by January 2027 or find another route to exemption (for example, if the foundation itself is controlled by a qualifying entity further up the chain).
The fee structure for PCs has not changed. Incorporation costs USD 100. An annual licence is USD 1,000. A confirmation statement filing is USD 300. These figures are a fraction of what a standard DIFC holding company pays.
Practical implications
For a holding structure that needs multiple entities, such as a real estate group with separate companies for each asset, or a venture capital fund with a dedicated vehicle for each portfolio investment, the savings are substantial. Stacking five or ten PCs at USD 1,000 per year (each) is fundamentally different economically from maintaining standard DIFC operating companies at significantly higher annual fees, each with their own office space requirements and heavier compliance obligations.
A new schedule of administrative fines has been introduced. Failing to appoint a CSP when required can attract fines of up to USD 20,000. Failing to provide documents to a CSP can result in fines of up to USD 100,000. Beyond fines, the Registrar can revoke a company’s PC status altogether by converting it into an ordinary DIFC company that would be subject to materially higher operating costs.
The 2026 reforms complete a journey that began when the PC regime was first introduced. What started as a tightly controlled structure, available only to those with a clear DIFC or GCC connection, is now a globally accessible holding company, one of the most cost-efficient vehicles in any common-law international financial centre.
The tradeoff is straightforward: the DIFC no longer asks who you are. Neither does it insist on how you operate. For businesses looking at the Gulf as a holding, investment, or structuring hub, the PC has just become an even more attractive option. The key is getting the compliance framework right from the start.