The final Law Update of 2022 is here, and it’s packed full of articles. The double edition features two focus areas, first is a spotlight on Energy and Resources and second we feature a collection of articles on Transport and Logistics. The developments occurring in these sectors in the MENA region are unprecedented and our lawyers cover vast themes for you.
The Energy and Resources focus features topics such as diversifying energy resources, solar PV, mining in the Middle East, renewable energy and green hydrogen. From a transport perspective, we draw attention to the Bahrain metro project, discuss the challenges and remedies associated with the repossession of an aircraft, and there is advice on what to consider should a party vary the terms of a shipping contract.
This edition navigates you through updates from across jurisdictions such as, Oman, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iraq, Qatar, and the UAE. Each article is timely and provides insights into legal issues and cases that are affecting these sectors across the region.Read the full edition
As part of Qatar’s Vision 2030 and the active steps taken towards improving intellectual property laws, the long awaited Industrial Designs Law No. 10 of 2020 (‘Industrial Designs Law’) was recently published in Qatar’s Official Gazette (Gazette No. 9 dated 10 May 2020). However, the implementing regulations are yet to be issued which means that design owners still cannot apply for the registration of their industrial designs in Qatar. In the meantime, precautionary measures or alternative ways of seeking protection for their creative designs may still be available.
Previously, before the issuance of the Industrial Designs Law and in the absence of a formal industrial design register, the Copyright Law (Law No. 7 of 2002), in accordance with the Berne Convention, had been applied. This means that an industrial design is eligible for protection as copyrighted work. Such protection does not require formal registration, and remains valid during the lifetime of the author and for 50 years beyond his/her lifetime
The implementation of the Copyright Law on industrial designs as imposed by the Berne Convention will no longer be applicable once the implementing regulations are issued and an official industrial designs register is created. In the interim, designers would be well advised to carefully consider whether protection should be claimed based on the Copyright Law now that the Industrial Designs Law has been issued.
As per Article 1 of the Industrial Designs Law, “any two-dimensional or three-dimensional composition of lines or colours which gives a special and new appearance to an industrial product or handicraft, and not merely related to the functional or technical aspect of the product” (unofficial translation), may be registered and protected as an industrial design.
However, in accordance with Article 7, designs that are: dictated by the usual, technical or functional considerations of a product; contrary to public order; or identical or similar to a registered or a well-known trademark may not be registered.
According to the Industrial Designs Law, the most important condition that needs to be fulfilled, in order to register an industrial design, is ‘novelty and originality’. This means that the design must be new and not have been previously disclosed to the public. The difficulty of satisfying this condition is not the condition in itself, but rather in the established practice of intellectual property owners who tend to use the intellectual property and then later apply for its registration.
As the novelty criteria is absolute, industrial designs must be filed in Qatar within six months of the earliest filing date as set out in the Paris Convention. Any public disclosure of a design prior to filing an application for registration in Qatar (or the priority date claimed if an earlier application is filed under the Paris Convention) will negate the novelty of the design, thereby compromising its legal protection due to it being part of the public domain. This will lead to a rejection of the application for registration and ultimately the loss of protection of an industrial design, which will no longer be considered to be exclusively owned by the original design owner.
The Industrial Designs Law does not provide a clear answer in relation to the examination process, and whether design applications will be examined as to the substance, or if the examination will be limited to formality. This is yet to be determined by the implementing regulations.
However, even where a substantive examination is determined, the question remains as to when such an examination will be practically possible.
In all cases oppositions by interested parties, after the initial acceptance and publication of industrial designs applications, and possible later appeals or cancellation actions before the court, will have a significant role in preventing any unlawful registration, in addition to establishing precedents interpreting the law.
Some countries operate a grace period of six to twelve months’ post-disclosure by the designer during which an application for registration may still be filed (and not rejected for lacking novelty as being part of the public domain due to the said disclosure). Unfortunately, a grace period is not available under the Industrial Designs Law, with the exception as set out below.
The new Industrial Designs Law mentions a grace period of six months only if the design is disclosed at national or international exhibitions, leaving the conditions and rules relating to any such disclosure to be determined by the implementing regulations.
The Industrial Designs Law, the Copyright Law and the Trademarks Law do not expressly prohibit concurrent protection, however the Courts’ interpretation of the various provisions as set out in these laws regarding the application of concurrent protection remains to be seen.
In theory, an asset or different aspects thereof, may be protected under more than one form of intellectual property when suitable under the applicable laws. This, however, is not automatic and a design (normally protectable under industrial designs) should not be submitted for copyright or trademark protection before carefully considering the potential impact of so doing and, in particular, the possible negative repercussions.
In some cases, it may be appropriate to apply for copyright or a three dimensional trademark to protect a design or certain aspects thereof. For example, when a design is also used as a trademark in commerce to identify the source or origin of products or services, it may be appropriate to consider its protection through a 3D trademark. However, the risk is that should the 3D trademark be cancelled by a court order, the design will already be within the public domain and no longer available for industrial design protection, and therefore both types of protection will be lost.
Key points to keep in mind are: