As we witness the evolution of the regulatory landscape across the MENA region, it was timely for us to investigate and lift the lid, on what is keeping the region’s legal decision-makers awake at night.
Our first-of-its-kind report titled Legal Leaders in MENA is out now! It captures the views of 700 legal decision-makers across nine countries and 13 industry sectors in MENA, as well as in-depth interviews with experts from key sectors such as financial services and education to name a few, which revealed the emerging risks and priorities challenging the legal sector across the region.
Read the full report and share your feedback with us at email@example.com.Read the full report
The Court of Cassation in Qatar issued an interesting judgment in June 2016 in relation to the enforcement of foreign Arbitral award in Qatar. The Court of Cassation confirmed two important rules related to the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award. The Court ruled that the award shall be recognized and enforced without any onerous conditions even if an annulment action is filed and pending before the Court at the country where the award was issued.
An arbitral award was issued in Paris under the Rules of International Chamber of Commerce. The holder of the award (the “Awardee”) filed a case before the enforcement court in Qatar requesting the recognition and enforcement of the award.
The other party filed an annulment case in Paris seeking an order to set aside the arbitral award.
Court of First Instance
When the Awardee, as the Claimant, filed an application for enforcement of the arbitral award in Qatar, the other party as the Defendant, argued that the application must be dismissed because the copies of the arbitral award and the underlying arbitration agreement, as submitted by the Claimant, were not authenticated by the relevant authorities in France and Qatar and that submission of authenticated documents is a usual requirement when submitting document before Qatari courts.
The Court of First Instance dismissed the application for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award based on the abovementioned arguments presented by the Defendant.
Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal also upheld the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
Court of Cassation
Against the order issued by the Court of Appeal, a further appeal was filed by the Claimant before the Court of Cassation on the grounds that recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards is subject to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the “New York Convention”), to which France and Qatar are signatories. Accordingly, Clause 3 of the New York Convention should apply and no further conditions other than the ones stated in the New York Convention should be required.
The Court of Cassation accepted the Claimants argument above and reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeal. The Court of Cassation confirmed the following important rules related to the enforcement of arbitral award:
Significance of the Ruling
This judgment is a very important development as it constitutes a friendly approach adopted by the Qatari Court of Cassation toward the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards. The Court of Cassation applied the provisions of New York Convention in a very efficient manner. This approach will no doubt facilitate the recognition and enforcement process of the foreign arbitral awards in Qatar.