This issue is filled with great insights and expert commentary on areas that are relevant to the legal landscape and highlight how the business community is embracing technology, media and telecommunications. There are various topics covered, from new ways of working and digital transformation in the finance sector to data protection regulatory updates and guidance. We also have a series of articles that focus on e-commerce across a number of jurisdictions.
You will also find insights from our lawyers around real estate analytics, tech trends, and data centres.
We hope this edition of Law Update provides some useful food for thought – enjoy the read!Take a read of the edition
By the end of March 2020, the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratization (the “MOHRE”) has issued a series of ministerial resolutions in response to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). This article considers the impact of each resolution, all of which were effective on 26 March 2020.
A. Ministerial Resolution No. (279) of 2020 Concerning the Employment Stability in Establishments of the Private Sector During the Application of Precautionary Measures to Control Novel Coronavirus Outbreak (the “Resolution No 279”)
The Resolution No 279 aims to protect the position of non-UAE national employees by private sector employers (who operate under the remit of the MOHRE and those in free zones that follow MOHRE resolutions) during the application of the precautionary COVID-19 measures by the UAE government.
The Resolution confirmed existing measures and provisions which are currently applicable under the Federal Law No 8 of 1980 (“UAE Labour Law”) and importantly introduced new measures that may be taken by employers who are affected by the precautionary COVID-19 measures and the associated economic crisis.
The following are open to employers to explore:
The Resolution gives the employer the right to take the above listed measures (steps 3-5 require employee written employee consent) and provides that those measures should be taken ‘gradually’. It remains to be seen how this will be applied in practice as many employers will not be in a position to take such steps on a gradual basis and are likely to have to take drastic measures on an expedited basis. We consider some of these measures in further detail:
The Resolution confirms the employer’s entitlement to ask employees to utilize their annual leave in accordance with the provisions of the UAE Labour Law. The Resolution makes reference that this measure should be taken only with the consent of the employee, however, this contradicts the UAE Labour Law provision which gives the employer the right to determine the date of commencement of the leave based on business needs.
In the event of a contradiction between an applicable law and a resolution, the provisions of the law would supersede the resolution. On this basis we consider that businesses can continue to rely upon the provisions within the UAE Labour Law.
Subject to the employer obtaining the written consent of the employee, the Resolution allows the employer to place employees on an unpaid leave. This is a newly introduced measure as the concept of unpaid leaves is not specified in the UAE Labour Law.
The Resolution does not refer to a maximum duration of unpaid leave which would give the employer the right to specify the required unpaid leave period according to its requirements.
The Resolution provides the following requirements when the parties agree that the employer will temporarily reduce salary:
The Resolution allows the employer and the employee to agree on a permanent reduction of salary. Where the salary is to be permanently reduced, the employer has to apply to the MOHRE for the MOHRE labour contract to be amended. This is reflective of the required practice prior to the Resolution being issued.
Most importantly the Resolution makes provision for redundancy. The concept of redundancy is not recognized by either the UAE Labour Law or the local courts. The Resolution provides procedural guidance to protect employees in circumstances where the employer identifies a surplus of non-national workers.
Significantly, the Resolution provides that the employer must continue to provide the outgoing employees’ housing and all of their entitlements (save for their basic salary) until the earlier of the individual exiting the UAE or obtaining the necessary authorization to work for another establishment (or the repeal of the Resolution No 279 upon the precautionary COVID-19 measures being removed). This is a material development and will act as a disincentive for employers when considering whether to reduce headcount.
In such circumstances the employer is required to offer outgoing employees the option of registering their details on the MOHRE’s portal for jobseekers known as the ‘Virtual Labour Market System’. Accordingly, these employees can be rotated and utilised by other establishments seeking to hire candidates within the UAE given the suspension of foreign recruitment. These employees can then be hired and authorization obtained electronically for the necessary work permits (work transfer permit to new employer, temporary work permit or part-time work permit).
The Resolution does not explicitly provide that employers can dismiss employees by reason of redundancy without compensation being payable. However, the recognition of the concept of redundancy within the Resolution No 279 (given the lack of recognition of this concept by the UAE authorities to date) may be an indication that the UAE Labour Courts may be more sympathetic to employers implementing redundancy dismissals (during the crisis) than it has viewed redundancy dismissals previously, this will be reviewed by the courts on a case-to-case basis and the employer’s compliance (or otherwise) with the terms of the Resolution may also be a factor that the courts take into consideration.
One of the concerns around reducing salaries or placing employees on unpaid leave has been the resultant impact from a Wage Protection System and the fear that the MOHRE may impose a block on an employer’s establishment card. With the introduction of the Resolution No 279, provided that employers follow the procedural steps outlined therein, we anticipate that the employer should not face any such issues via WPS given that it is a scheme administered by MOHRE.
In summary, the Resolution No 279 places a significant burden on employers who choose to reduce headcount during the current COVID-19 crisis. In the alternative, it sets out procedural guidance and affords some flexibility for employers in terms of other steps that may be taken to alleviate cash flow pressure in the current climate.
B. Ministerial Resolution No. (280) of 2020 Concerning the Creation of a Committee For Considering The Stabilization of Citizen Conditions in The Private Sector (the “Resolution No 280”)
In brief, the Resolution No 280 aims to protect the position UAE’s nationals working in the private sector. By virtue of this Resolution a committee will be formed and assigned with the following mandate:
C. Ministerial Resolution No. (281) of 2020 Concerning the temporary guide regulating the remote work in private establishments (“Resolution No 281”)
As noted above, Resolution No 279 gives the employer the right to implement home working. Furthermore, the MOHRE issued Resolution No. 281 offering guidance and regulating the remote work in private sector establishments affected by the precautionary measures taken by the government to fight the spread of COVID-19. The Resolution sets out the obligations of the employee and the employer to facilitate remote working arrangements.
For example, employees have certain obligations including that they:
In addition, the employer’s obligations include providing the technical equipment necessary for the employee to perform their work facilitating remote workers’ communication with their colleagues.
The Resolution requires private-sector employers to reduce their workforce physically present at business premises to the minimum necessary for business operations, setting a maximum limit of 30% of total workforce being in attendance. The Resolution has also required that the private sector employers must reduce the number of customers visiting their premises to a maximum amount of 30% of the premises’ seating capacity.
The Resolution gave priority to certain individuals who should work such as:
Notwithstanding, there are some vital and critical sectors that the Resolution has excluded from the remote working requirement, those sectors are as follows:
The scale of the crisis has merited legislative changes at a pace which we have not seen before. The steps taken by the MOHRE in respect of the aforementioned Resolutions are part of the wider measures the UAE government is taking to help support businesses in the private sector that are affected by the precautionary measures. We can anticipate further measures, particularly in some of the free zones that are exempt from the application of these Resolutions and we will continue to provide updates as changes occur.