Book an appointment with us, or search the directory to find the right lawyer for you directly through the app.Find out more
Welcome to the latest edition of Law Update titled “Rise of Generative AI.”
In this edition, we dive into the dynamic world of Technology, Media, and Telecommunications (TMT) across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. TMT continues to play a vital role in positioning the region as an international business and social hub, driving significant growth and innovation.
Our focus in this Law Update is on the sector’s ongoing potential to advance and propel the region toward a more digital economy. We explore the benefits of embracing a digital transformation and how local authorities have responded by enhancing regulations to accommodate the evolving TMT landscape.
This edition covers a range of topics, including – the new Telecommunications & Information Technology Law in Saudi Arabia, the intricacies of trademarks in the Metaverse, and the legal challenges faced by the video game industry. Additionally, we take a regional perspective, discussing jurisdictions such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, and Bahrain to provide a comprehensive understanding of the TMT landscape.
We hope you thoroughly enjoy this packed issue of Law Update, filled with captivating articles that address key legal issues within a vital sector for the region.Read the full edition
Ashish Banga - Senior Associate - Consultant - Banking and Finance
There has been an increasing interest of foreign investors in the use of special purpose vehicles (‘SPV’) in the structuring of securitisation transactions in the UAE. The financial free zones in the UAE i.e. the Abu Dhabi Global Market (‘ADGM’) and Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) have played a pivotal role in attracting this interest by providing an option of a flexible, robust, simple and efficient SPV regime that is well suited as a legal entity for securitising a portfolio of assets.
Businesses that wish to transform their illiquid assets to cashflow usually opt for either a factoring or securitisation structure, both of which enable a business to sell its assets (usually account receivables, i.e. outstanding monies owed to that business) to third parties at a discounted price. While under a factoring transaction, third parties are typically banks and financial institutions, under a securitisation structure, the idea is to procure funding from not just the banking sector but from the wider investment and capital markets.
Under a securitisation structure, the twin objectives of transferring assets for the benefit of investors and, at the same time creating a capital market instrument can be achieved by using a SPV. SPVs are specifically and solely created for the purpose of: (i) holding assets sought to be transferred by the originator, the assets, once transferred, are ring fenced for the benefit of the beneficiaries of the SPV; and (ii) the issuance of financial instruments by the SPV, providing exposure to the underlying assets transferred to the SPV. Investors do not have to acquire or purchase all of the assets of the originator directly, but they do so indirectly through the securities issued by the SPV with their investment decision depending on their risk and investment appetite. In practice, while the assets of the originator are transferred to the SPV, making the SPV the legal owner of the underlying assets, the SPV is a conduit between the assets and the ultimate investors, making the holders of the securities the ultimate beneficiaries of the underlying assets.
Under the laws of UAE, the restrictions on foreign shareholding and filing requirements often make it difficult for foreign investors to set up an onshore SPV and implement a securitisation transaction. Also, UAE law does not recognise the notion of a trust removing the availability of a critical structuring tool employed in securitisation. However, the basis of the ADGM and DIFC legal framework is English and common law meaning trust structures can be used in connection with its SPV regime. For purposes of this Article we will limit ourselves to benefits of securitisation structure under ADGM.
A typical securitisation structure under ADGM’s ambit can be explained as below.
By virtue of being incorporated in the ADGM, the SPV regime offers a number of benefits including:
In addition to these benefits, there are certain other benefits that may incentivise foreign entities to set up SPVs under the ADGM regime for a securitisation structure, such as: independent ADGM Courts; an efficient timing for set-up; no restriction on the number of shareholders; a quick and easy fully digital registration process; no attestation requirement for corporate documents; which may incentivize foreign entities to set up SPVs under the ADGM regime for a securitisation structure.
However, an SPV set up for a securitisation structure cannot conduct ‘financial services’ in or from the ADGM, unless it is appropriately authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority. This would depend upon the business plan discussed and submitted with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority. Subject to the review of this plan and objectives of the structure, an SPV is advised by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority on the kind of licensing they are required to adhere to under the financial regulations of the ADGM.
The financial participants interested in setting up a securitisation structure within the UAE may consider ADGM as a potential option in addition to already existing options under the DIFC, given the benefits these financial free zones offer and provide set-up and regulatory mechanism similar to a lot of common law jurisdictions. We will be happy to discuss this and assist with potential set-ups in either of these financial freezones.
To learn more about our services and get the latest legal insights from across the Middle East and North Africa region, click on the link below.