Welcome to the Saudi Arabia focus edition of Law Update.
One of the key markets in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) that continues to lead from the front is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). As the largest country in the Middle East and the 18th largest economy in the world, the progress KSA continues to make is underpinned by its Vision 2030 that envisions developing the country as an investment powerhouse and hub that ultimately connects Asia, Europe, and Africa. Given Saudi Arabia’s significance to the regional economy, our team of experts have prepared a range of pertinent articles that provide insights into new laws, regulations, and the legal landscape in the Kingdom.
This edition will provide you with an up-to-date guide on matters such as; the framework issued by the Saudi Central Bank on IT governance, the anti-corruption landscape under Vision 2030; we also provide practical tips for dispute avoidance. This is only a snapshot; there are many more articles within the KSA focus section for you to read, which we hope you will find valuable and enjoyable.Read the edition
The long-awaited Cabinet Resolution No (40) of 2019 (the ‘Resolution’) issued on 3,July 2019 provides the necessary detail to implement the provisions of Federal law No (4) of 2016, concerning Medical Liability (the ‘Law’).
Article 34 of the Law introduced stringent penalties for medical practitioners who commit a ‘gross medical error’ to include imprisonment and a fine. The issuance of the Resolution helpfully now clarifies the circumstances in which a medical practitioner is considered to have committed a gross medical error, which will be discussed in detail in this article.
Further, Article 18 of the Law requires all medical malpractice claims to be referred to a New Medical liability Committee (the ‘Committee’). The Resolution provides clarity regarding the formation of a Committee and outlines the rules and procedures each Committee must follow.
For the purposes of this article, we have provided a summary of the key provisions of the Resolution as follows:
Article 5 of the Resolution sets out the circumstances in which a medical practitioner is deemed to have committed a ‘gross medical error’. Before the issuance of the Resolution, a gross medical error was not defined and therefore a practitioner who committed any malpractice (whether gross, or not) could be held criminally liable. In accordance with Article 34 of the Law, only medical practitioners who have committed a gross medical error will be held liable for criminal medical negligence. As a gross medical error is now defined by Article 5 of the Resolution, we consider there will be a decline in the number of malpractice cases referred to the criminal court.
The new Resolution provides the circumstances in which gross medical negligence occurs as follows:
“1. A Medical error is considered ‘gross’ if it causes a death to a patient (including a fetus), loss of a limb, impairment to a bodily function, or any other gross damage, including but not limited to the following:
Articles 8 -15 of the Resolution provide the necessary detail regarding the formation of the Committee and the rules and procedures each Committee must follow. In the first instance, all medical liability cases must be referred to a Committee for determination. The existing Supreme Committee will act as an Appeal Committee only. In accordance with Article 20 of the Law, the complainant and the medical practitioner can file an Appeal with the Supreme Committee within 30 days of receiving the Committee’s report. Before the issuance of the Resolution, the Supreme Committee reviewed all complaints and its decision was final.
Article 4 relates to the prohibition of medical research and experiments conducted on human beings unless his/her consent is obtained as well as from the competent authority. We expect the Minister of Health will issue future guidance regarding the controls, rules and procedures regulating the conduct of medical research and experiments on humans.
The appendix to the Resolution sets out the terms and conditions for the provision of Remote Health Services. Previously, Remote Health Services were prohibited in the UAE. Patients, therefore, were required to visit their Medical Practitioners in person.
Key definitions of the Remote Health Services as per the Resolution are as follows:
The issuance of the Resolution provides much needed clarity regarding the implementation of the Law. It is expected that the Law and the Resolution will improve the quality of healthcare in the UAE and streamline the manner in which malpractice claims are managed. The Resolution helpfully clarifies the definition of the meaning of ‘gross medical error’ and outlines the rules and procedures regarding the formation of a Committee. Medical practitioners and patients will now have greater protection, as appeals can now be heard through the Supreme Medical Committee.
Al Tamimi & Company’s Litigation team regularly advises on legal and regulatory matters pertaining to healthcare litigation. For further information, please contact Mohamed AlMarzouqi (email@example.com).