This issue is filled with great insights and expert commentary on areas that are relevant to the legal landscape and highlight how the business community is embracing technology, media and telecommunications. There are various topics covered, from new ways of working and digital transformation in the finance sector to data protection regulatory updates and guidance. We also have a series of articles that focus on e-commerce across a number of jurisdictions.
You will also find insights from our lawyers around real estate analytics, tech trends, and data centres.
We hope this edition of Law Update provides some useful food for thought – enjoy the read!Take a read of the edition
Jeremy Scott - Partner - Real Estate
Other names used for similar or related concepts are “Residences” and “Branded Apartments”. Generally the concept of MSA, Residences or Branded Apartments will contain the following features:
In this article we explore the legal backdrop to the concept of MSA. It should be noted that this article does not purport to comment on the licensing requirements of the Dubai Economic Department or Dubai Tourism Commerce and Marketing
The simple description above of a MSA scheme belies what is in fact a relatively complex legal and commercial arrangement with many potential variations possible.
We consider in more detail below, the nature of MSA schemes under the following topics:
A. The Legal Entities involved in providing MSA.
B. The Relevant Legal Documentation.
C. Commercial and Practical Considerations in Structuring MSA Schemes.
D. Regulatory and other Issues Arising.
A) The Legal Entities involved in providing MSA
In theoretical terms, once the development is complete the management of the “Common Areas” and general administration of the development should pass to the Owners Association formed pursuant to Law No 27 of 2007 on Ownership of Jointly Owned Properties in the Emirate of Dubai (“JOP Law”) and regulated pursuant to RERA’s “Directions” to the JOP Law.
The investors become the Owners of the Units. By virtue of their ownership, Owners are members of the Owners Association, are entitled to vote at meetings of the General Assembly and be elected as Board members of the Owners Association.
If therefore the developer wants to ensure that there is the ability for a Hotel Operator to operate from the development, this will have to be procured by a contract with the Owners Association.
The Owners of the Units will also need to enter into their own private arrangement with the Hotel Operator for the rental of their Unit, should they wish to use the Rental Pool.
B) The Legal Documentation
The principal document relevant to the creation of a MSA scheme is the Sale and Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), between the developer and investors. Ideally, the SPA should fully disclose or make sufficient reference to the documents set out and discussed below:
The Rental Pool Agreement will generally entitle the Hotel Operator or Hold Co (as the case may be) to manage the Unit for a fee. The obligations on the Hotel Operator or Hold Co would generally include; arranging tenants and occupiers, maintaining the Unit, paying all outgoings in relation to the Unit and paying the balance of the revenues to the Unit Owner.
Whilst it may be possible to design the MSA scheme independently of the Hotel Operator and endeavour to incorporate the necessary flexibility to adapt to the requirements of any Hotel Operator, generally such schemes are designed in tandem with the Hotel Operator at the conceptual and design phases of the development.
The developer / Hold Co and the Hotel Operator would also enter into the Operating Agreements relating to the Hotel and/or MSAs. It is important in doing this that any commercial considerations in such documents are also carried down through the documents referred to in 1 to 6 above in so far as they relate to or in any way impact on the legal entities referred to.
C) Commercial and Practical Considerations in establishing a MSA scheme
Considerable effort and consideration needs to be put into MSA schemes to ensure that they meet the expectations of investors and the Hotel Operator without conflict, and with clarity on the structuring. It is important to remember that not all of the investors may want their Units to form part of the Rental Pool, and some investors may want to actually reside in the development.
For resident Owners, they may not want many of the services that the Hotel Operator provides as mandatory and for which they have to pay for. They may nonetheless be happy to pay for some services on a “User Pays” basis.
For other investors, there can be the inclination to see any Ameliorated Services as being the obligation of the Hotel Operator (as they are operating a business from the Common Areas of the development and profit from same), and therefore the costs should be met out of the Hotel revenues. Accordingly the exact service, cost and revenue matrix needs to be developed and investors made aware of same.
We consider, in simple terms, the services to be offered in relation to a development comprising MSA fall into the categories set down in the table below.
Association Management Services (a service to the Owners Association (“OA”)).
Contracted Services (facilities management) provided in relation to Common Areas.
Ameliorated Services (a la carte and other similar hotel type services)
Note: services specifically related to Units in the Rental Pool are excluded from consideration in the table as any costs associated with such Units would be for the Owner of that Unit under the Rental Pool Agreement. If the costs of providing services in relation to such Units formed part of the budget for the Owners Association this would severely prejudice those Owners who chose not to put their Units into the Rental Pool. It is the case however, that services in relation to the Units are covered in the Rental Pool Agreement, it being a private arrangement between the Unit Owner and Hold Co/the Hotel Operator and the costs of the same are deducted from the revenues obtained from letting out the Unit.
The Association Management Services are clearly a cost of the Owners Association and would be budgeted for and paid for by Owners through their payment of Service Charges. Likewise the Contracted Services would ordinarily be contracted for by the Owners Association in the same fashion.
The controversial category (should we take the view of the cost conscious resident Owner) will be the Ameliorated Services. Some of these may be able to be provided on a “User Pays” basis, such as the putting of a Unit into the Rental Pool or Unit maintenance services. If this is the case those “User Pays” services would ordinarily be removed from the Owners Association budget. Some Ameliorated Services may however be less easily categorized as “User Pays”. Take for example “Reception” services and “Bell Boy” services which may be used by all Owners and occupiers and not just guests to the Rental Pool. In such cases it needs to be clear whether the Hotel meets the costs of the same or the services are procured by the Owners Association and paid by Owners through their payment of Service Charges.
Another potentially problematic aspect of MSA, is that the Hotel Operator may also want to control the nature of the services offered to the Owners Association by service providers and choose service providers to ensure that it can meet its Brand Standards. Sometimes the Hotel Operator may want to provide services itself and in such circumstances there may need to be a process to benchmark and apportion costs.
Careful consideration from both a legal and commercial perspective needs to be given to the issues raised in this Part C and it is suggested that appropriate disclosure of the arrangements may reduce the potential for disputes with Owners or the Owners Association at a later date.
D) Regulatory and other Issues Arising
Readers may appreciate that a MSA scheme is a more complicated ownership arrangement than simply owning an apartment in a building which is nonetheless regulated pursuant to the JOP Laws and Directions.
It should be emphasized furthermore that if developers could bind the Owners Association to long term contracts this could seriously undermine the freehold nature of the investment.
MSA arrangements are not surprisingly therefore regulated in the Directions. In particular the following provisions of the Directions may apply should RERA determine:
In addition it is likely that RERA may require:
It is probable that RERA may exercise its discretion as above, having regard to the fairness of the scheme overall on Owners. In addition it is very likely that RERA may also consider, in exercising its discretion, the extent to which the developer has complied with the disclosure regime set down in the Direction for General Regulation and therefore the extent to which the investor appreciated the nature of the scheme into which he was investing.
The above represents an overview of a managed and serviced apartment scheme in the context of Dubai regulation to date. As mentioned this Article does not deal with licensing considerations.