Legal documentation for projects relating to major sporting events such as the World Cup and Olympic Games...
Legal documentation for projects relating to major sporting events such as the World Cup and Olympic Games (and also Dubai Expo 2020 for that matter) must necessarily achieve the core functions of the timely delivery of the project as well as the on-going legacy of economic, social and environmental outcomes once the event has concluded. This dual role is neatly encapsulated in the name of the organising body for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, namely the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy.
The core Project Delivery Agreement (PDA) for a project relating to a major event will outline standard provisions dealing with issues such as capacity of the parties, responsibilities, timing, monitoring and reporting, construction and handover, representations and warranties, default and termination. However, the PDA must also be sufficiently robust, yet flexible, to deal with the particular challenges and drivers facing event specific projects. The key issues facing major event projects including those summarized below.
In many cases, local laws are not sufficient to address the many complexities and manage the many risks associated with major sporting events. As a result, enabling legislation may be required to:
The PDA will need to reflect these regulatory changes and provide for the satisfaction of any government checks and balances built into the project delivery process.
Request for Proposals
Most major project works broadly require a request for proposals followed by a bid proposal and evaluation process. This is particularly so where the proponent is a State or government body as they usually have well-established procurement protocols.
Whilst the bidder will be driven to deliver innovative design, cost effective completion and value for money, the proponent can be expected to concentrate on governance, the probity of the process, the proper evaluation of what may be quite different proposals and the maintenance of competitive tension in the bid process for as long as possible.
In a straightforward construction project for particular identifiable works, the relevant form of PDA may be attached to the bid documents. However, where the proponent is looking for innovative design and ideas from the bidders themselves, the PDA may need to be finalised later in the bid process to reflect the final agreed design and scope of work.
The allocation of risk between the stakeholders is a crucial factor in the negotiation of the PDA. The focus of each party will be squarely on the identification and avoidance of risk or, if avoidance of a risk is not possible, the minimization or transfer of that risk.
The assumption of risk by a party will usually lead that party to adjust its financial analysis of the project and, in the case of a bidder, this may have detrimental effect on the prospects of success of the bid.
Many PDA’s include a form of risk allocation table that lists the identified risks and then allocates responsibility for each risk to a particular party. The allocation of each risk can be a matter of hard-fought commercial negotiation but a reasonable approach is that the party best placed to manage a particular risk should assume responsibility for it.
For example, the contractor may be prepared to assume responsibility for risks such as site conditions, financing and changes in economic circumstances whilst the proponent may be prepared to assume responsibility for risks such as changes in law or policy and, possibly, the remediation of existing environmental contamination.
The project construction terms and conditions can either be set out in the PDA or in a separate construction contract and will generally impose fairly standard rights and obligations on the parties.
However, there are a number of aspects which should be carefully considered, including the following:
Major sporting events generate enormous marketing opportunities, and therefore revenue for the organisers and other stakeholders. In the context of major event facilities, advertisers can be expected to require a clean facility, free from any existing signage and with the minimization of potential ambush marketing, so that they can overlay their advertising and related promotional features. The PDA will need to include provisions that satisfy these requirements.
The legacy of major sporting events for the community now has major prominence in the bid process and is usually a significant local political issue. It is recognized that events such as the World Cup and Olympic Games occupy a very limited period of time (in the case of the Olympic Games, 16 days) whereas the on-going legacy of the project will last for many years.
The legacy can include not only the use of the facilities and infrastructure but also the disposal of retrofitted facilities such as the sale of the apartments from the residential areas occupied by the contestants. Importantly, where the particular project has been implemented by the private sector, the relevant PDA could include an on-going profit sharing arrangement for the State to fund additional facilities or go into consolidated revenue to achieve other desired outcomes.
Project delivery documentation for major events has many similarities to usual project agreements. However it is crucial to ensure that the documentation is carefully drafted to anticipate, and address, the particular requirements of these projects that distinguish them from the standard.
Alan Hall has considerable background and experience in the delivery of major projects and related infrastructure, including acting for government in relation to the project delivery agreement for the Melbourne 2006 Commonwealth Games Athletes Village. Alan is a member of the Corporate Commercial Department in Al Tamimi & Company’s Riyadh office and is a key member of our Sports Law and Events Management practice.